Poor gets poorer
Just a few months back, the government appointed the wife of Senior Minister of State for Defence as the new Auditor-General. They claimed there was no conflict of interest. See No COI. Thank you Chan Chun Sing for explaining the process of selecting an AG but no, it does not address the fundamental conflict of interest issue. Unless you don't know what it means. But we are not really that stupid that we can't tell it doesn't address it. Actually, explaining the process does address another issue... nepotism. But that wasn't the topic, was it? Or maybe there was some underlying sense of guilt over nepotism that resulted in this being used as the explanation. Hmm...
Regardless, it demonstrates the government's lack of care about what's right and wrong. Ask any audit committee. Will they knowingly appoint someone related to one of their company's employees as their head of internal audit? I don't think it's rocket science that you don't do that. It's not about whether the person supposedly has integrity or the relevant experience. The perceived independence is what's most important. Duh.
Anyway, I was recently triggered by the announcement of the GPS ERP system. It got me so mad that I decided it's time to write my blog to release some pent-up angst. The principle of it is just plain wrong. No, it's not about the fact that it can track if I'm speeding or having an affair, or even losing my privacy to the government. I know the debate between privacy vs. security can go on endlessly with more than 100 different perspectives. Yes, I know elsewhere in the world (e.g. EU) is swinging towards stronger privacy protection for their people while our government is obviously going in the other direction. In any case, the wrong principle I'm highlighting is about penalising the poor once again. Just like the ever increasing GST.
Distance penalty has already been built into the current driving system through fuel taxes. The more you drive, the more fuel you require, the more taxes you pay (unless you are free to go JB every other day but then again you are limited to the amount you can pump and you still need to drive a distance). And now the new system is ALSO about taxing you by distance. Guess who stays in the outskirts of Singapore, like Yishun, Pasir Ris, Jurong West? The crazy rich? No..... it's the common poor folks like me. And who are those who can afford to stay in town or near town? Well, no prizes for getting the right answer. Bottomline is, why do the commoners keep getting penalised for not being in the richer tier who can afford to stay somewhere more central? We are now double-penalised with the new system!
So if we are so poor, why do we still get a car? Come on, go fix the MRT before you ask people to stop using the car! Even before any of us switch to public transport, it is clear that our infrastructure cannot even cater to the population who's using it. The breakdowns are so common that they are no longer news. That's how sad it has become.
By putting buffoons with NO experience on running transportation companies at the top doesn't solve the issue. Oh, money solves the issues for them. Just get the most expensive solutions and pray they work. But where does the money come from? Ohhhhhhh..... wanna guess? Singapore supposedly has a PTC who CARES for the commuters. The only significant thing I recall them doing is to increase the fares for commuters. Why are they not challenging the increased costs instead? Didn't our labour union advocate cheaper, better, faster? What happened to that slogan SMRT and PTC? So yeah, I won't be surprised that the super high costs incurred to resolve our MRT issues are happily cascaded down to the commoners. And the people at the top who are spending profusely regardless if the issue is fixed or not? Ah ha... I believe they are getting fat salaries and bonuses.
For us poor people, our money is stuck in CPF and depreciating by the minute. The CPF pays 2.5% / 4% while our inflation is higher than that. And they just announced a 6.4% increase of electricity tariffs. See tariff rise. What this means is that, our savings will never be able to keep up with the cost increase. And by the time we retire, we will probably be in the same state as our parents where the value of their savings once upon a time could really help them retire comfortably but now, can barely even pay for daily expenses. $2 used to mean a meal for me but now, can only buy me a cup of tea. I wonder what it can pay for in 20 years time... entry to the toilet?
Many people say, if so unhappy, then migrate lor. Now, Singapore is my country and my family roots are here. The government is NOT the country. If they do something wrong, why should I be punished for it and leave the country? Shouldn't it be them? Anyway, I'm waiting for the time when it's my turn to be "bribed". I wonder what they will call my generation. After pioneer, merdeka... the disgruntled generation? :)
